Talk:A. M. W. Stirling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article name[edit]

The article name should be rather Wilhelmina Stirling and the redirect be made from her writer's alias A. M. W. Stirling. The De Morgan Center which is responsible for her collection and heritage uses the name Wilhelmina. Apart from having published under the name A. M. W. as an author (but not solely under this name!) she is also an individual with a life, which is part of this article. Therefore she should be referred to as a person, not an akronym. --Grizma (talk) 07:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 June 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 15:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


– See page disk for reasons Grizma (talk) 07:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:19, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Grizma: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The stated reason is "The article name should be rather Wilhelmina Stirling and the redirect be made from her writer's alias A. M. W. Stirling. The De Morgan Center which is responsible for her collection and heritage uses the name Wilhelmina. Apart from having published under the name A. M. W. as an author (but not solely under this name!) she is also an individual with a life, which is part of this article. Therefore she should be referred to as a person, not an akronym. --Grizma (talk) 07:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC).". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME, WP:RECOGNIZABILITY. See NGRAM:[1] (t · c) buidhe 10:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hahahaha, yeah, great! Because the acronym was well known in 1900. Guys, we live today. Well, do as you please. --Grizma (talk) 20:04, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]