This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
Not notable as a standalone prelude (and the other article could be more detailed about each prelude) Kayau (talk · contribs) 15:00, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: A detailed book about this prelude, and all the others as well, could be written by a more experienced editor on this field. With due respect, you'd better start expanding the article yourself. KrenakaroreTK 21:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Krenakarore (who I see created this separate article on just this prelude) provides no evidence whatsoever that "a detailed book" could be written - even if such a thing might be thought desirable - about a piano piece that lasts less than a minute. In any case, the piece was written as part of a carefully planned cycle of 24 Preludes, and as such is part of a sequence of 24 keys and of contrasting piano pieces within which it gains its full significance: it is therefore a nonsense to suggest an encyclopaedia should devote a discrete article on just this piece. Alfietucker (talk) 18:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Actually this separate article is rather odd, because it appears to be describing not the prelude itself, but the piano roll recording of Scriabin's performance of it. Imaginatorium (talk) 19:45, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Devahn58 and Krenakarore:
Those movements are not notable by theirselves. Their composing history could be explained in this article as subsections of a section about the composition history. Details of the music itself could be explained as subsections in the Structural Analysis section. The previously proposed merge would accompany the information of the current proposed articles' information. The Typos Checker (fixed typos) 00:17, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think no.4 is well known, but no.9 and no. 10 lacks notability.(I thought it is chopin prelude) 16:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC) QiuLiming1 (talk) 16:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
