Talk:2021 Bahamas Bowl/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 21:35, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.
Good Article review progress box
|
Infobox and lede[edit]
- "The seventh edition of the Bahamas Bowl (after the 2020 edition was cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic)," → "The seventh annual Bahamas Bowl, as well as the first to take place after the COVID-19 pandemic forced the cancellation of the 2020 game,"
- The cancellation of the 2020 game is also neither mentioned in the body nor referenced in the lede, so one of those facts should be corrected
- Link quarterback and rushing yards in the second paragraph
- Link touchdown pass in the third paragraph
Teams[edit]
- "all-time" → "ever"
- "This was the first edition" → "It was also the first edition"
- Link bowl game in "13th bowl game appearance"
Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders[edit]
- "dropping their overall record"
- Last sentence of this section needs a reference attached
Toledo Rockets[edit]
- "this time on the road against Central Michigan"
- Also needs a citation at the end of the paragraph
Game summary[edit]
Pre-game[edit]
- Link the first instance of rushing yards
- "MTSU" is used for the first time in this section, everywhere else it's "Middle Tennessee". I'd put (MTSU) in parentheses when the team is first introduced in the background para
- Link quarterback
First half[edit]
- Link Kickoff (gridiron football)
- Use an en dash instead of a hyphen after "capitalize off of this miscue"
Second half[edit]
- See above about en dashes
Scoring summary[edit]
- Good
Statistics[edit]
- Good
References[edit]
- I used a script to fix some dashes, so now everything looks good formatting-wise
- SB Nation is not the best source; if another reference can be found, I'd prefer those be swapped in
General comments[edit]
- No images, so those criteria cannot be assessed
- No stability concerns in the revision history
- Earwig copyvio score looks good
Putting on hold to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions, and please let me know when you're finished! — GhostRiver 22:15, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- @GhostRiver: thanks very much for the speedy review! I've made these changes (with the exception of two, see the en-dash issue), if you wouldn't mind looking it over again. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 00:14, 2 February 2022 (UTC)