Talk:2014 Taiwan food scandal
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 | The contents of the 2014 Taiwan food scandal page were merged into Food safety incidents in Taiwan on date and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
New Sections[edit]
I think the article should be expanded to include sections on "Consumer Reaction" and "Lawsuits". Lasersharp (talk) 07:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- I actually somehow agree. As more information is coming in, I think this article has to be fully re-written or rearrange. When I initially write it, I put background, effect & reactions. I'm not sure on the part of the reactions from ROC governments (ministries & agencies), whether to put that in that "Reactions" section, or to have it all written chronologically as the main story of this Wikipedia article? let's say the story goes like this:
- when the tainted oil was found
- initial effects & reactions (customer panics, share price drops, many foods returned to shops etc)
- gov initial reaction followed by public & businesses concrete reactions (stop importing from taiwan, order school & military to stop using food with tainted oils etc)
- how it became widely spread already (outside taiwan)
- punishments made by kaohsiung city gov to the chang guan co. company (fines etc)
- mitigation plan so that this incident wont happen again the future & with any vows from the officials
- Probably those points have to be all written in the main body of the paragraph, without writing them too much at the "Reactions" sections, because it won't look like it is sequential. Lasersharp, maybe you wanna do that improvements? ;)
Chongkian (talk) 15:37, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
New Story Part[edit]
Man, this story keeps on going again and again. After the September case, now it is the October case already. Seems like there are still many more info to come. I think we should really rearrange and reorganize this article to accommodate all of those necessary and important information (some which are still ongoing). Chongkian (talk) 16:49, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- agreed. Lasersharp (talk) 23:13, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2014 Taiwan food scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140911002259/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/local-companies-take/1354178.html to http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/local-companies-take/1354178.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:19, 21 June 2017 (UTC)