This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
The scores do not add up properly, apparently the "2nd leg" column is inconsistent (home-away order differs from match to match) - Nabla (talk) 14:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Before removing the contradiction notice, please correct the results from:
2nd round
Nakhon Pathom - Rajnavy Rayong (2-3 plus 3-1 does not add up to 3-6)
Chiangrai United - Pattaya United (1-1 and 1-0 do not add up to 1-2)
Narathiwat - Bangkok United (0-4 and 5-2 do not add up to 2-9)
Nong Khai - Royal Thai Army (1-1 and 2-3 do not add up to 4-3)
Semi-final
Rajnavy Rayong - Thai Port (3-1 and 1-3 do not add up to 4-5)
Given the article is unsourced there is no easy way for me to correct other than guessing. Thank you - Nabla (talk) 11:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So it's obvious that someone put the results the wrong way round, not realy hard to reverse, look at:
Nakhon Pathom - Rajnavy Rayong (2-3 plus 3-1 does not add up to 3-6) can you not see how this became 3:6?? 2nd result should be 1:3 Druryfire (talk) 15:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, that is a good guess, with high likelihood of being correct. But is it correct? And should we guess content for encyclopaedia articles? I presume guessing is not the best way, so I asked for the intervention of someone that *knows*. Do you? Cheers. - Nabla (talk) 18:46, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]