Talk:2009 Monaco Grand Prix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Free practice[edit]

Anyone know why the practice sessions were held on Thursday instead of the usual Friday? Is Monaco always different in this respect? Nanonic (talk) 22:46, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monaco Grand Prix#Organisation. MelicansMatkin (talk) 23:07, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cite error[edit]

I'm not sure what's wrong with this revision, but if someone could fix it then I would be grateful.--Midgrid(talk) 18:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted. Someone had mistakenly put the Q1 times for the bottom five qualifiers in the race classification section. Cs-wolves(talk) 18:49, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!--Midgrid(talk) 18:53, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nakajima[edit]

Wasn't he times as "+2 LAPS"? –Howard the Duck 07:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton's grid penalty[edit]

The source says he was given a 10 place penalty. Can we please report this accurately? It doesn't matter that the net effect was Hamilton only moving back five places. Mjroots (talk) 17:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted this change - I believe the Autosport source was incorrect. I've got the Autosport magazine (28-05-2009), and this refers to a 5 place penalty, which is what the FIA sporting regulations say it should be(article 28.6). I've changed the reference to one from the independent newspaper, which also says it was a 5 place penalty. Spute (talk) 21:20, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 2009 Monaco Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]