Talk:2004 Kumbakonam School fire

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in December 2014.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2021 and 30 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ReaganCSMC.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Future Editing Plans[edit]

Howdy, all! I just wanted to hop on the talk page here and let anyone currently active on this article know that I am looking to start editing it here soon. The main thing I am looking to focus on is the organization of information. After reading this article, it seems like the article is geared more towards the trials of the first rather than the incident itself. I look forward to working collaboratively with you on this article. ReaganCSMC (talk) 12:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Content Shift/Removal Ideas[edit]

Howdy, all. While reading through this article, I noticed that most of the information seems to focus on the trial rather than the fire itself. To me, it feels as if this article focuses too much on said trial. Some ways I was thinking about changing this were: Moving all trial information to its own section, removing trial information if it is in violation of any Wikipedia rules, or creating a separate article for the trial itself. Do any other editors here have suggestions on ways we could handle this? ReaganCSMC (talk) 17:54, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After thinking about this further, I do not believe that we can split this article into two separate articles. However, I do believe that we create two different sections, one with information about the first, and one with information about the trial. I will work on this in a custom sandbox and link it here shortly. Again, if anyone has any suggestions I would love to hear them! ReaganCSMC (talk) 19:51, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article is well below the 100,000 byte recommendation for splitting, so you don't have to worry about that. Having all the information in one article in this case is the correct thing to do. Organising both into separate sections could be okay, as long as it doesn't remove context from one section that then requires the other section to be read to understand. Regards, DesertPipeline (talk) 05:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. That's exactly what I did here! ReaganCSMC (talk) 15:34, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't had time to take a look at it yet, but I'll check when I can and let you know what I think. Also, I added a heading to your last thread and fixed the indentation of your last comment here (when replying to someone, just do the same number of colons as they did, plus one more. It gets complex if there's more participants but check Wikipedia:Indentation for that). Regards, DesertPipeline (talk) 03:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]