Talk:100k on a Coupe

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles

Songs

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

100k on a Coupe was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 25, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed
February 24, 2021	Articles for deletion	Redirected

Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:100k on a Coupe/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will review this later today; good to see you have been nominating so many Pop Smoke songs for GA, but remember to add wikiprojects on the talk pages of the articles. --K. Peake 08:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

Wikilink Victor Victor Worldwide in the infobox per MOS:LINK2SECT
Change the first chronology to being solely for Pop Smoke
Target digital download to Music download
Target streaming to Streaming media
Add a sentence after the release one to mention how everyone felt about the song when first listening to it
"the song was included on" → "it was included on action-adventure game" with the wikilink
Target GTA Online to Grand Theft Auto Online

Background and composition[edit]

"when he and" → "that when he and"
"listen to it; he stated that everyone recognized that the song" → "listening to it, everyone recognized the song"
Target programming to Programming (music)
Target mastered to Mastering (audio)
Target mixed to Audio mixing (recorded music)
Either mention in the release sentence that it was in the United States or various countries; only do the latter if you add more citations
There are mentions of the song's percussion and hook from sources that you should write in this article
"states that Pop Smoke raps," → "stated that Pop Smoke raps,"
Are you sure you can't find any sources that mention the lyrical meaning of the song, rather than just listing lyrics?

Kyle Peake There was only a handful of reliable sources for the song. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 01:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reception and usage in media[edit]

"opined that it was" → "opined that it is"
"said it felt" → "said it feels"
"full-fledged track,"" → "full-fledged track"," per MOS:QUOTE
"stated that it was" → "stated that it is"
"and distinctive cadence."" → "and distinctive cadence"."
"He continued saying" → "He continued, saying"
"at high volumes."" → "at high volumes"."
"the Brooklyn native."" → "the Brooklyn native"."
Target GTA Online to Grand Theft Auto Online

Credits and personnel[edit]

writer → songwriter

References[edit]

Copyvio score looks decent at 37.9%
Make sure all of these are archived by using the tool
Wikilink Apple Music on ref 3
Below the references, there are the categories listed for the song but you have not added anywhere near enough; start with basics like Pop Smoke songs

Final comments and verdict[edit]

On hold until all of the issues are fixed, plus it is good to complete a review for you today after the article from last night was passed earlier on! --K. Peake 10:49, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 01:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Ultimate Boss You still need to add the sentence to the lead I mentioned, mention the release was various or in the United States and change writer to songwriter. I'd advise you to pay attention to everything that is said during reviews, as I shouldn't really have to go over comments again for short articles like this one. --K. Peake 06:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake, why do I need to add if was released various or in the United States? Seems very tedious to add that. I’ll fix the other issue though. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 06:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Ultimate Boss That is normally how releases are mentioned in articles, plus I was referring to change writer to songwriter in the personnel section like I mentioned earlier... you cannot do that in the infobox it now displays no writers. Also you still forgot to add the sentence to the lead like an unreliable editor. --K. Peake 07:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Ultimate Boss There's only three fixes and since that is a small amount, I did them for you due to your activity elsewhere and feel free to alter if there's anything you think I was incorrect to write in. ✓ Pass --K. Peake 06:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]