Talk:Žiče, Slovenske Konjice

Slovenia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: Jože Tisnikar (sl), Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Omar Naber, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 63 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

Renaming proposal[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus below is that no primary topic exists among these villages. Per the suggestion below, I have redirected Žiče to Zice for the purpose of easier disambiguation among them. Xoloz (talk) 18:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Žiče, Slovenske Konjice → Žiče – By far the best known place named Žiče. Eleassar ^{my talk} 13:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - sl:Žiče is a dab with Žiče, Slovenske Konjice, Žiče Charterhouse Žiče, Domžale - English wp should have a similar dab (which can be done in 30 seconds). In ictu oculi (talk) 20:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Seems like primary topic, here, In ictu oculi; one has 520 people, one has 60, and one is a house. Maybe the Slovenian WP has a vastly different perspective regarding their standards for disambiguation? I've found that on the Spanish WP. We have the article on the second-largest city in Mexico (1.5 million people) at Guadalajara, but because there's a Madrid exurb named Guadalajara heading a Spanish province of the same name (~300,000 inhabitants), es:Guadalajara is currently a disambiguation page. I disagree with them but that's their practice. Perhaps Slovenia's WP is different? Red Slash 22:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is nuts. What on earth for? We don't have to hide one of these villages. What possible purpose does hiding one of them serve? WP:RM is not the great hide-the-article game. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

? I'm rather confused. Red Slash 23:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PRIMARYTOPIC should be used sparingly where ambiguating a title might really help people. Ambiguating tiny Slovenian villages is not what WP:PRIMARYTOPIC was intended for. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it the concept of primary topic doesn't scale very well. That's a reasonable position to take. I'm not sure I agree. (And unless a reader is very familiar with the small towns of Slovenia, Žiče, Slovenske Konjice, Žiče, Domžale, Žiče, etc... they're all unclear!) In any case, if there's no consensus to move here, then Žiče would be best to redirect to Zice so we have one solid disambiguation page. Red Slash 19:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Frankly, they're both relatively obscure. I'd prefer a DAB page, as In ictu oculi suggests. Doremo (talk) 05:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per In ictu oculi and per the Slovenian wiki, and per the similar obscurity of all these places. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.