Category talk:Opera companies

Companies Category‑class

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Category This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Opera Category‑class

	Opera portal This category falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Adding opera companies category to musical groups category makes no sense[edit]

Given the notation at the top of that category's page, Category:Opera companies, does not belong there.

Vivaverdi 01:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I must say that I don't see your argument. The text at the top of the Category:Musical groups page to which I presume you are refering states "This category contains musical ensembles. For individual musicians, see Category:Musicians." Primarily this text is intended indicate that individual musicians do not belong in the musical groups category. If that's the source of your objection, then this text could be refined. However, I don't believe that it needs to be changed as if you take a look at the musical ensemble page you will see that the term "musical ensemble" covers opera.

I would ask that you consider the following:

Opera is form of musical expression.
An opera company is a group of people.
Therefore an opera company is a musical group (ie a group of people who come together for the purpose of making music).

Additionally:

The musical groups category is broad (everything from Category:Orchestras to Category:Marching bands).
It is a good idea for a category to have at least two parent categories (see Wikipedia:Categorization#How_to_create_subcategories). Currently this category only has one parent.

Greenshed 01:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At 03:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC) Vivaverdi placed the following text on Category talk:Musical groups:

"THIS SAYS IT ALL: "This category requires continual maintenance to avoid becoming too large. Please diffuse articles into relevant subcategories as needed: discuss large-scale changes on the talk page first. If an article exists in both this category and a relevant subcategory, or it simply does not belong, remove its category marker"."

I'm guessing that Vivaverdi wrote the above in response to a note I left on his/her talk page requesting a comment on my remarks here dated 15 December 2006. I have copied Vivaverdi's remarks here so that the thread of discussion can be seen.

The catdiffuse text indicates that articles need to be diffused into subcategories; not that there are too many subcategories. For the reasons I've outlined above, I'm making this cat a subcat the musical groups category. I request that anyone who wants to revert my edit address the points I've made above. Greenshed 00:43, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]