This category is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
If “Performers of Irish Dance” is synonymous with “Irish stepdancers” then it should be a subcategory of this cat. However, if it is significantly broader, then a new subcat would be necessary: Irish stepdancers.Mais oui! (talk) 07:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Mais oui!: The problem is significantly broader in my opinion; Riverdance and shows of its ilk have blurred the boundaries between types of Irish dance considerably (though many of those boundaries were artificial distinctions to begin with). Not everything Flatley does in Riverdance is strictly stepdance, but at the same time, that style is certainly the predominating influence and conversely the style which has been influenced the most by his accomplishments. I feel that it would be too difficult to draw distinctions between stepdancers and professional Irish dancers. Triptothecottage (talk) 07:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That is fine. These types of issues are very common in categorisation. The key thing is that articles and sub-cats should be included in parent cats when they reasonably would be expected to be there. “Double categorisation” is a very minor problem. Therefore, forget about an “Irish stepdancers” subcat, and we’ll just add “Performers of Irish dance” to this cat.Mais oui! (talk) 08:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]