Category talk:Chinese poetry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconPoetry NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconChina Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Feb. 2012 additions - broadening[edit]

Having reviewed the Categorization and Categorization of people guidelines, I have added several dozen pages, being some of the most prominent poets as well as the Classic of Poetry and the collection Nineteen Old Poems. I did this for convenience of cross-referencing and I'm completely confident that each of these deserves a mention under the lofty generic category of Chinese poetry. These are either very major figures or else a lucky few whose isolated well-recognized poems exerted a major influence. I'm painfully aware that this broadens the assorted links under this category in a way that is inconsistent with the neat categorization of nested sub-categories that was already in place. I dared to do this in part because the guidelines allow for multiple categorization schemes. I figure people who know what they are looking for can drill down to or through the sub-category(s), but more casual visitors should be able to get a fine buffet at a glance. And what was there previously under the pages without sub-categories in many cases had a painfully miscellaneous feel. So these few dozen top poets now have a platform here in addition to their place on the list of Chinese poets or under the dynastic sub-categories of poets, both of which I think are inherently meant to be more extensive and provide worthy homes for the many more minor poets. In other words, I was not trying to be comprehensive by including who I did here at the lofty Chinese poetry generic level. I apologize if the consequences of my sense of convenience offend anyone and I do not mean to create disorder. Philipmerrill (talk) 11:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]