Wikipedia talk:Disruptive editing

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Disruptive editing page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives

Expert retention Archive 1 - pre-Sept. 2006
Archive 1 - Sept. 2006
Archive 2 - Sept. - Dec. 2006
Archive 3 - Feb. 2007 - Nov. 2007
Archive 4 - July 2007 - Sept. 2009
Archive 5 - Oct. 2009 - Nov. 2011
Archive 6 - Nov. 2011 - March 2012
Archive 7 - March 2012 - current

This page has archives. Sections older than 300 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Is a long string of 'micro-edits' disruptive?[edit]

Could other editors (perhaps admins) take a look at the editing history for 2012 (film) and advise as to whether the recent edits to the plot summary constitute disruptive editing? It's an exceedingly long string of what I'd call 'micro-edits' unaccompanied by edit summaries, and I personally find it nearly impossible to determine the net effect of the editor's changes or anticipate when they intend to be finished for awhile. I left them a note at their Talk page but I don't believe they've responded. I'm not pinging that editor at this time in case the prevailing view is that this doesn't constitute disruptive editing. Thanks for your input! DonIago (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiDee[edit]

"WP:DEE" redirects to this article. Perhaps something along the lines of "For the WikiFauna species, see Wikipedia:WikiDee" should be added? Antrotherkus (Talk to me!) 17:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:DONOTDISRUPT" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Wikipedia:DONOTDISRUPT has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 14 § Wikipedia:DONOTDISRUPT until a consensus is reached. — AP 499D25 (talk) 09:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Time to change IDHT[edit]

I'm probably in the minority on this but despite its common usage in English, I'm of the opinion that using deafness or hearing loss as an analogy for stubbornness, uncooperativeness, or disruption, is disparaging towards deaf/hard-of-hearing people. I notice the name/shortcut of WP:IDHT tends to encourage the use of this analogy, and I think Wikipedia should rename it to something else. Levivich (talk) 16:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about "deafness or hearing loss" or inability to hear, it's about refusing to listen or plugging one's ears. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 07:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I will grant a conflation between "plugging ears and refusing to listen" and "cannot hear" seems easy to make, I would question what could be done about that. There are many tropes for antisocial tropes that are a hop, skip, and a jump from direct characterizations of people with cognitive disabilities, et al. We can't rely on bare rhetorical proximity for these judgements, or we cede all ground of what words mean to what they could mean, rather than realizing that we have some influence over what they do mean, if that makes sense. All this said, I could always be unaware of just how close these connections are, so I'm happy for someone to educate or vibe check me, but all I can be is honest. Remsense诉 02:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bludgeoning[edit]

Surprised to see WP:BLUDGEONING not mentioned here, unless I missed it. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 07:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think many of the editors here in Wikipedia know not what BLUDGEONING means and would say, "Bludgeon? I did not bludgeon them, they were brused before i hit them! It was a fair fight." :-) GeorgeV73GT (talk) 08:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]