User talk:Ad Orientem

Welcome! Please read this before posting here.

If I left you a message on your user talk page or elsewhere, please respond there. If you leave me a message here, this is where I will normally respond. If you want to alert me to your message, you may ping me. (It is not necessary to ping me when leaving messages on my talk page as I am automatically alerted by email.)
If you have a problem or need help with something please leave a message. However, if your issue does not involve me personally, or is time sensitive/urgent, you may wish to request help on one of our noticeboards.
If you are here because you think I made a mistake somewhere, YOU COULD BE RIGHT! I am neither omniscient nor infallible. Let's talk about it.
Please be polite and remember to assume good faith. Also check the potty language at the door. I don't talk to other people that way and I expect the same courtesy in return.
While minor editing is fine, for the sake of continuity of records please don't delete comments on my talk page even if you later conclude you were wrong. If you want to retract a comment, just add a note or you can ~~strike out the text~~.
Private emails are welcome. However, in the interest of transparency; requests for administrator actions should generally be made openly either here or on the relevant noticeboard/talk page discussion. Exceptions where commonsense or policy/guidelines may require discretion, are understood.
Special note to admins: If you think I muffed something feel free to revert or otherwise fix it. Just kindly leave a note.
Experienced editors are free to respond to any queries on this page, especially if the message has been sitting for a while without a response.
Lastly, I'm a part-timer, so bear with me if I don't get back to you instantly.

If you have questions comments or concerns feel free to drop me a line below. Please post new topics at the bottom of this page, and remember to sign your message with four tildes (~~~~).

Click here to start a new topic.

Archives

Index

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12
Archive 13	Archive 14	Archive 15
Archive 16	Archive 17	Archive 18
Archive 19	Archive 20	Archive 21
Archive 22	Archive 23	Archive 24
Archive 25	Archive 26	Archive 27

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Note[edit]

Just a note (see diff below) to explain that I replied to your apparent comment to me ("Really?") at the AIV. However, I don't think you got the message as another administrator removed it shortly afterward. Just wanted to explain why I reported a stale IP ([1]). Yours. Zenon.Lach (talk) 19:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Zenon.Lach Well another admin has blocked them. Given only the 1 non stale edit, I wouldn't have. But it's done. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision Delete Request[edit]

Hi there,

I asked @Hey man im josh already but it appears that they are offline. Could you delete the ones requested on their talk page and the ones on Dark skin? Thx! Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh you just did it. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Myrealnamm Yeah, that was a bit over the top. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And this? The edit summary, especially. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem There's a few more before ClueBot NG reverted. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I'm giving too many. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my wording was awkward. I meant that I posted two here. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright. The last one was kinda borderline but I zapped it. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Ivan Boesky[edit]

On 23 May 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ivan Boesky, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About your partial block of Factcheckworld212[edit]

2601:240:CF80:70:4813:EE43:9963:A91D ? Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Skywatcher68. Apologies for the late response, but I've been out of town (and ill) for most of the last week. Not sure if your concerns have been addressed by another admin. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, hope you're feeling better. I started a SPI while you were gone; results inconclusive. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 02:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Big article in need of help[edit]

Hey Ad Orientem, Split of Christianity and Judaism Is quite skeletal, and could use some support from interested editors :) Zanahary (talk) 08:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Zanahary Yeah that does look a little rough. Have you posted to WT:Christianity and/or WT:JUDAISM? -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea—I just notified both. Zanahary (talk) 02:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thanks for your years of work in–among various other contributions–upholding NPOV. (In fact, I wouldn't mind seeing you more in the post-1992 politics arena again...) In any case, best wishes! Biohistorian15 (talk) 16:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Biohistorian15 Thank you for the kind words! That said I find the project's coverage of modern American politics to be a source of not infrequent frustration and prefer to avoid the topic except when dealing with obviously disruptive behavior. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User will not abide by "do not post on my talk page"[edit]

Hi AO. I have previously asked the editor Lunar-akaunto to not post at my talk page three times. They still don't get it. This editor was blocked for close to two years and changed their username. I asked them on their old account not to [2], then when they were unblocked, one of the first things they did was post on my talk page again, even acknowledging in the post that I asked them not to post there. Now they see fit to answer others' questions for me. I know you don't like when editors ask others not to post at their talk page because it can block open communication or some such, but there is no need for them to post at my talk page. Could you maybe ask this user to respect whom I want posting at my talk page? Ss112 06:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, fine, I won't post ever again. Be happy. I only ever posted because you reverted the editor in question and did not provide an explanation in the edit summary or on the talk page when asked. Clearly, it is not possible to read through all the templates, and not everyone's familiar with all the guides, so I thought it'd be helpful. Lunar-akaunto／talk 06:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lunar-akaunto: Whether I choose to answer somebody at my talk page or not is really none of your concern. It's not something you need to intervene on my behalf for, especially when I've asked you not to post there for any reason. My revert of that editor was sufficient enough explanation. Now please leave me alone—that includes looking through my contributions or perusing my talk page. We don't even edit in the same topic area 95% of the time. I have only posted at your talk page to point you to guidelines and what is best practice on en.wiki because disregarding them is what you were blocked for (and an article you created the other day showed up as lacking an album cover in a tracking category before you uploaded the album cover, which is how I came across your file names). That doesn't mean what I said about my talk page no longer applies. Please take my talk page off your watchlist if it is on there. Ss112 06:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not intervene on your behalf; I did so for the project as a whole. Clearly, the user posting on your talk page even after your edit summary indicates he did not understand why you reverted them. I absolutely have no desire to look through your contributions or talk page. I only arrived at your talk page because you did not respond to the file names conversation you initiated on my talk page. I thought to post regarding that but changed my mind and happened to see the other user's message (if I did have your talk page on my watchlist, I would have replied 2 days ago, don't you think?). But if you insist, I'll let this be our last interaction in words. bye~bye. Lunar-akaunto／talk 09:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lunar-akaunto: You have "absolutely no desire to look through [my] contributions", yet you obviously did look through my contributions to find that I posted here—I didn't ping you and you've never posted here before. To clarify: I felt that my response was enough. I didn't say you, they, nor anybody else found it sufficient, and again: whether I choose to reply to someone or not, including you, is my choice. It was not an obligation because it's not a serious matter. Ss112 10:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I got here because of your edit summary; this definitely implies that you would reach an admin for this. Anyone reading that understands that. Lunar-akaunto／talk 11:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you had to look at my contributions to find whom I went to. Anyway, I'm done here. If what you're saying is true, then responding for me on my talk page or following me to talk pages won't be an issue in the future. Ss112 11:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]