Talk:Sapphic
Disambiguation | ||||
|
Requested move 2 May 2024[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Sapphic be renamed and moved to Sapphic (disambiguation). A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Sapphic → Sapphic (disambiguation) – Now, sapphism already exists and explains the meaning of sapphic as the primary topic, as it's directly derived from Sappho. I propose renaming it and retargeting Sapphic to sapphism. --MikutoH talk! 21:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 02:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 17:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject LGBT studies has been notified of this discussion. --MikutoH talk! 21:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support - as nominated. Most people searching for sapphic are going to be looking for the article at Sapphism. Raladic (talk) 22:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Sapphic stanza has equal or greater long-term significance. Srnec (talk) 13:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This page was created five minutes ago and is already claiming to be primary topic? I am not sure that page should even exist, and not just merged or redirected to "Lesbianism". Walrasiad (talk) 01:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Bisexual women are not necessarily lesbians (though bi-lesbians are real). And lesbianism wasn't even the original target. --MikutoH talk! 00:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- These are clearly distinct topics. -- NotCharizard 🗨 12:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support, but under the pretence that sapphism is renamed to "sapphic", which is the term used in most of the references in the article. -- NotCharizard 🗨 12:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)