Talk:Polis (board game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 21:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Piotrus (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 509 past nominations.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article looks good. Hooks is interesting and checks out; however, out of the two sentences in the article that make this claim, none have a citation immediately following; since you're using the Depaulis source, you should put it after "which unlike polis remained popular to this day". (However, the quote from Max Nelson needs a citation afterwards too.) QPQ checks out. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 16:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Generalissima, I am not sure if I fully understand what you mean - end of paragraph citations are fine AFAIK for short paragraphs where there are no other sources. That said, I've added a direct quotation relevant to the hook's claim to one of the refs - I hope will address the main issue. Diff. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • Piotrus Usually, yes, but WP:DYKG says that sentences containing the hook must be cited. It's irritating; that being said, all is good now. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]