This user is busy in real life, and may not reply swiftly, and if they do, may reply in an abbreviated fashion.
Do you like my editing? Do you want to say hi? If so, please check out my guestbook here. Note: This message is also on my user page.
If I send you a message on your talk page, please reply there. I will be waiting. If you'd like, ping me. If you send a message on my talk page, I will reply here, and please expect to be pinged.
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.
This is TheTechie's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
What was your rationale for removing the posts from Liz's talk page? I'll note that Liz had restored some of it when the original editor removed other's edits(diff). – 2804:F14:80B7:8201:C4DC:E500:5610:A60F (talk) 01:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It did not make any sense, wound up looking like a huge pile of incoherent text. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/$ 14:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that is not one of the (presumably non-exhaustive) examples of appropriately editing others' comments at WP:TPO - and as I pointed out, in this case, Liz restored some of it, so it seemed pretty clear that Liz didn't care about having it there, even if she didn't feel the need to respond. Though I guess she's also not shown any inclination that she cares it was removed either, but I'm just going to say, maybe don't remove it if it's a situation like this. – 2804:F14:80E4:8401:960:2088:A68A:DF55 (talk) 22:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Understood, sorry. Even if I have 4K edits to my name, I'm still learning . Thank you for the note. (I removed it because it looked incoherent and I didn't want to disturb Liz with it.) thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/$ 00:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]