User talk:Yoshi24517
| This is Yoshi24517's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
 | Yoshi24517 is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Please note: I live on the West Coast of the United States. I may not see your message due to time zones. In which case, I will respond as soon as I can. Thanks!
Current time at my location: 7:38 am, May 28, 2024 PDT [refresh]
Please remember to stay civil when contacting me, otherwise your message may be ignored and reverted. As a gentle reminder to experienced editors contacting me, please remember WP:DTTR. I know about the opposite part of this essay, but as such, I prefer to not be templated. Thanks.
- If you came here because I reverted your unsourced change, please cite your sources in the page or article you edited, bringing them here doesn't help very much.
- Please place new messages at the bottom of the page. To start a new section, click the New section/Add topic button at the top of the page.
All sections are automatically archived by a bot (Lowercase sigmabot III) automatically after 7 days of inactivity.
Current Status: Very Busy
-Status updated as of Tuesday, May 28, 2024 at 14:38 UTC.
Click here to find out what each status means.
Click here to purge this page to update this page.
Snuff films and "alleged"[edit]
Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia and english isn't my first language so I hope I'm doing this right, sorry if this is meant to be in the article talk page instead, I didn't want to start an edit war. Snuff films are alleged according to the article itself, as the lead concludes with "According to the fact-checking website Snopes, there has never been a verified example of a genuine commercially produced snuff film. Videos of actual murders (such as beheading videos) have been made available to the public, generally through the Internet; however, those videos have been made and broadcast by the murderers either for their own gratification or for propaganda purposes, and not for financial gain and thus do not qualify, by definition, as a 'snuff film'." It is also stated in more detail that snuff films are not known to exist in the "Reality" section of the article.
If you like I can keep the word "alleged" out of it but was the rest of my edit (making it clearer that they are explicitly made and sold for profit, and removing the arguably redundant statement that they are often graphic) okay and I can revert it or do you think it was better before? Up to you, you don't have to give a reason.
Thank you. Sorry if I did this wrong. -unsigned comment by IP 2A02:C7E:3188:4C00:3982:B0EF:78AA:B84C
- Hello IP, I feel you can do the same edit, just without the word alleged. Your explanation makes sense, just if you add the word "alleged" it makes your edit seem a little weird. Hope this helps! Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 22:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Have a great day. 2A02:C7E:3188:4C00:3982:B0EF:78AA:B84C (talk) 22:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC)