Welcome to Keivan.f's talk page.
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply. I will try to WP:PING you as well. Conversely if you are replying to something I've said on another talk page, reply there and include {{ping|Keivan.f}} to alert me.
Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.
@Keivan.f As we all know, Catherine recently penned a letter to the Irish Guards of which she is the Colonel. Should we include it under the Health subsection of the Personal life section or is it insignificant in the longer term? Looking forward to know your thoughts on this. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 07:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Have you reviewed any FAC in the past? Just asking since both Gog the Mild and Tim have previously said that reviewing other nominations at FAC helps in gaining reviewers for one's own nomination. No wonder there is a nominations-to-reviews ratio on the FAC statistics page, which is undoubtedly an important metric.
Looking forward to your response. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 08:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On other Wikipedia editions, yes; on English Wikipedia, no. Frankly it's quid pro quo. You review one article and they might review yours and it overall helps with decreasing the backlog, but it still doesn't guarantee that you'll get support votes. You article has to be genuinely good. Keivan.fTalk 15:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]