Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 November 24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 24[edit]

Template:Surgeries[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to a list article Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template not useful for navigation - it is a list of completely different operations. I propose either deletion or moving to a list. Tom (LT) (talk) 05:29, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:54, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • make it into a list article, way to big to be useful as a navbox. Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Victoria's Secret Fashion Show model navboxes[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:06, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PERFNAV. An appearance in a fashion show is nothing more than a performance. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:22, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Useful navigation tool. Moreover, as previous posters stated, this is one of the highest career achievements in modeling. That means this is not just a performance, but a career award/honor within a professional field, for which there are similar templates, such as Template:Nobel Prize in Physics, which is obviously in a very different field, but even in the same field, it is comparable to Template:2000–09 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit. —Lowellian (reply) 00:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:H-1 aux[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NENAN and the past precedents at WP:USRD/P. We just don't do navboxes like this for so few links, let alone just two. Imzadi 1979  19:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fred Gallo[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough active links to provide useful navigation. No article for navbox subject. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lucian Bratu[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No active links. Provides no navigation. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, the parent article has the list and this provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:57, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mihai Constantinescu[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough active links to provide useful navigation. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dinu Cocea[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough active links to provide useful navigation. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Andrei Blaier[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough active links to provide useful navigation Rob Sinden (talk) 13:01, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chief Ministers of West Bengal[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Transcluded only once and redundant with Template:West Bengal Chief Ministers present. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, redundant (or merge with the article and delete). Frietjes (talk) 14:14, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Media and entertainment companies of the Philippines[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the creator of this template and now I have realized that it should be broken down into separate templates because it has become bloated. Hollyckuhno (talk) 05:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PrSpam[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 3 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Joplin Blasters roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:59, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Team folded, no current roster. oknazevad (talk) 02:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).