Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 June 12

< June 11	June 13 >

June 12, 2006[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete -- Drini 22:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nospam[edit]

Comment what other templates does it duplicate --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 20:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
{{spam}}, {{spam2}}, etc. —Cuivi é nen 21:03, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. —Cuivi é nen 21:03, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - {{spam4}} has the exact same message but presents it better. -- Loudsox 21:51, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I hate spammers, but this template is useless in the presence of the other. I do, however, think that the bigger size of the hand picture is an advantage. (Ok, I know this is stupid) Afonso Silva 22:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Overly general and in-your-face, purpose is served better by other warning templates. Grand master ka 22:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant. --Coredesat 03:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Anonymous__Anonymous 14:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete -- Drini 22:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Login[edit]

Delete this and the other - per nom. Afonso Silva 18:24, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this and the other - per nom. --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 20:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, will endorse its removal -- Drini 22:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, self-referential. --Coredesat 03:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Move to User Namespace Anonymous__Anonymous 14:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userify both. Why not? Septentrionalis 18:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete -- Drini 22:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Logout[edit]

Yes, will endorse its removal -- Drini 22:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, violates WP:SELF.
Delete. per nom. --SomeStranger^(t|c) 00:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, self-referential. --Coredesat 03:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Wikipedia is not a freewebhost/blog, and template was causing copyvios (showing fairuse logos on userpages) -- Drini 23:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Soxwin[edit]

Delete - per nom. Afonso Silva 18:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete also uses copyrighted logo, which violates fair use terms by inclusion in a template. --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 20:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Deleted -- Drini 23:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Soxlose[edit]

Strong Delete also uses copyrighted logo, which violates fair use terms by inclusion in a template. --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 20:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete -- Drini 22:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HoneybeeArticles[edit]

Template:HoneybeeArticles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
De-linked template now usurped by Template:BeeColonyMemberTypes. Template was way too long to be added into SeeAlso sections. Nav template covers almost all the material and is much more organized. larsinio (poke)^(prod) 17:17, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--SomeStranger^(t|c) 02:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Coredesat 03:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete -- Drini 22:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Musician info[edit]

Unused template. There's even a notice which recommends not to use it. CG 17:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This looks more like an MTV bio than an encyclopedic template. Too detailed and redundant with more widely-used templates. Grand master ka 22:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is far too many categories to place in a template. This information could be better displayed in infobox format.--SomeStranger^(t|c) 00:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per (self-proclaimed) author's own comments on template's talk. -- Loudsox 02:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, author admits that this template is garbage. --Coredesat 03:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Already speedied -- Drini 23:18, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ẏstari Games[edit]

Template:Ẏstari Games (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I'm the author. Since this was a convenience template to call Template:Unicode for people who couldn't type or display the Y with dot above otherwise, I decided to use the simpler name Template:Ystari instead. Che Fox 05:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As the author and sole editor, you can simply tag it with {{db-author}} as an author-requested speedy deletion. I've done that for you. —Cuivi é nen 15:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete -- Drini 23:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:White American[edit]

Delete - raises too many red flags. --Leifern 01:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. The ethnicity ones are fine (like German Americans), but white/caucasion isn't an ethnicity, just a race. -- Loudsox 02:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per nom. -- Olve 02:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Tewfik^Talk 02:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No valid knowledge purpose served. Thanks Hmains 03:24, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 04:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. Far too POV, can't see any valid reason served. Very divisive and unhelpful. Grand master ka 05:24, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. POV. —Viriditas | Talk 07:58, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and others above. --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 09:26, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unsourced and useless. Afonso Silva 12:32, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 17:19, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not meaningful, not useful.--Pharos 17:33, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. unsourced and anti-semitic (the editors insist on removing "American Jews" which they say is not a white "race" Rjensen 21:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 23:19, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.