Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Myst series

Myst series[edit]

Myst series

10 articles

Myst

Riven

Myst III: Exile

Myst IV: Revelation

Myst V: End of Ages

Uru: Ages Beyond Myst

Myst Online: Uru Live

Characters

The Myst Reader

This all started when I randomly started improving Myst back in May, and then embarked on a grand campaign to shiny up all that is on the wiki. Uru: Ages Beyond Myst is at FAC currently, but is still GA and not needed to pass FTC. All the Myst articles should have been merged into the ten above. --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 16:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support - good luck with the FAC - rst20xx (talk) 17:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - topic is comprehensive on the Myst franchise, all requirements are fulfilled - Hekerui (talk) 22:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support – no problems that I can see. Excellent work. -- Sabre (talk) 00:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support igordebraga ≠ 01:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- _{Escape Artist Swyer} ^Talk _{Contributions} 01:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ - The articles Mysterium and Mystralia are missing in the topic. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 13:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fan conventions are a world apart from the actual published material (questions regarding the notability of those articles aside.) --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree such articles are not needed for the topic, but would probably be suitable for supplements. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 23:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]
    - I withdrew my opposition. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 12:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support – looks good. Great work on all those articles. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 08:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Z gin der 2009-02-05T19:14Z (UTC)
Support: Was wondering when you were getting to this. I see no major issues. The articles are of high quality, share a defined scope, and an appropriate lead. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 23:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Support - meets WP:WIAFT.--TRU CO 18:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I went ahead and fixed the "Characters" link so it now links to "Characters of Myst" rather than just "Characters." Xnux the Echidna 18:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh whoops, my bad. Sorry! rst20xx (talk) 19:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support; fits the criteria. Good work. Tezkag72^{私にどなる}_{私のはかい} 04:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 13:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]