Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Michael Schumacher Ferrari 2004.jpg

Reason: Excellent image: A very well done Motion blur: as it must be. Encyclopedical relevant, too. Brilliant.

regards, —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support reasons see above —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Does not meet 1000px minimum size. I agree that it's a great photo. -- Coneslayer (talk) 21:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but size is not the highest precept. At least in my opinion. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That's why we have documented criteria, instead of everyone coming up with their own. -- Coneslayer (talk) 13:18, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oppose too small. Looks like it's on a hill. de Bivort 21:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're nice! But here's some punctuation in case that was the confusing issue. de Bivort 05:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose too small, the slant does make it look on a hill but thats not really a problem. C hris_huh^talk 21:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, far, far too small. --Aqwis (talk – contributions) 22:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, does not meet criteria #2. Cacophony (talk) 03:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Too small; slanted. --Malachirality (talk) 20:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I dont mind the slant but the size is indeed too small. Minimum requirements 1000 px. H92110 (talk) 15:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 03:04, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]