User talk:JayCubby/Archive 69

Archive 65

←

Archive 67

Archive 68

Archive 69

Your submission at Articles for creation: 18650 battery (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jmcgnh was:

Update: Screw it, I was bold!

 The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:18650 battery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:54, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

For starters, it's a bit hard to fit more info in to that table. I also think the 18650 battery incorporates some aspects into existing battery-related articles, possesses distinct features, experiences widespread use, and holds historical significance that merits a separate article. Providing a comprehensive resource dedicated to this specific battery size offers readers a deeper understanding of its unique characteristics, technological advancements, and impact on various industries.

TL;DR: Big deal, used everywhere. Odds are if you are editing wp from a thick laptop, drive an EV, or own a high power fleshlight flashlight, you are using the One True Battery. JayCubby (talk) 23:35, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

I wasn't suggesting that what you might want to add must fit inside a table cell. Support your argument by adding a section to one of the suggested, existing articles, using sources that show that this particular variant merits more attention. The draft did not do that. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Ah ok, tx. Will do JayCubby (talk) 13:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, JayCubby! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 20:54, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Badge of Honor #1:

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Diode bridge) for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 19:59, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Tyvek

Just curious about your ES here. Should a {{COI}} hat tag be added? An {{advert}} and COI tag were removed on 3 Feb 2023. If a COI is used, a {{Connected contributor}} and/or {{Connected contributor (paid)}} probably should be added to the talk page. Probably a new talk page section as well... Such a pain! Watchlist full. Plz wp:PING? Thanks for your hard work! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 00:48, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

I'm not completely sure what you're saying. If I am interpreting it correctly however:

One of the ip addresses (71.191.195.241) is located fairly close to dupont hq. Seems to be 𓆜 to me...

You want me to keep an eye on it? Sure, I can try.

I just stumbled across this article and thought it seemed a wee bit promotional.

I will add the CC template. Cheers! JayCubby (talk) 02:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Oh, and the remover you mentioned has many edits in the textile field. Very sussy. JayCubby (talk) 03:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Please assume good faith and don't cast aspersions. I edit in the textiles field because it's been my main interest since I was 14. As it states in my edit summary, I thought I'd cleaned up the issues in a satisfactory way – clearly I missed something. I was editing at about 8pm, so I was likely tired, and it probably wasn't my best work.—Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 12:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Time for the jannies to dust off the ban-hammer, mebbe? JayCubby (talk) 03:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

You're jumping the gun. I know you're new to Wikipedia, but going from "this edit seems suspect" to "ban them!" without even talking to me first is extremely bad conduct. And contrary to what state in your edit here, I certainly am not a Tyvek employee. I'm not even employed full stop.—Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 12:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

The whole basis of this is on your removal of the ad/coi template bundle. What I think happened is the removal seemed fit as you know more about the subject than others. However, it's clear to me and other editors that Tyvek is ad-ish. Your past edits on textile articles suggest you have a close connection to textiles. Hope that makes sense JayCubby (talk) 15:04, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

I certainly didn't intend to start WWIII. I just ran across Tyvek as well. Seeing you had added two hat tags, I thought you might have more familiarity with the topic than I. No need to keep an eye on it, unless you want to. I just added a cite for Tyvek bibs and filled in a NASA Ames cite. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 01:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

No, I have no experience in textiles, I just came across it wiki-surfing and saw it needed some moderate tagbombing. Fair, but I'll leave the tone/connection things until someone else with knowledge comes across it. Take care JayCubby (talk) 01:54, 17 October 2023 (UTC).

MFDs

Hello, JayCubby,

You are bringing draft articles to MFDs on grounds that the article subjects aren't notable so I recommend reading Wikipedia:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity. Drafts don't have to meet the same criteria that main space articles do so it's not good to provide a deletion rationale that doesn't apply in Draft space. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:28, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Fair, I didn't realize that. Cheers. JayCubby (talk) 02:46, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi JayCubby! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 22:18, Monday, October 23, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

"Microbial methylation" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Microbial methylation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 30 § Microbial methylation until a consensus is reached. Espresso Addict (talk) 22:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

"Googe.com" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Googe.com has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 9 § Googe.com until a consensus is reached. Star Mississippi 01:00, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Gulshan Yadav

Hello JayCubby -- Please don't write edit summaries that disparage the creator of articles, however unpromising they might appear. "Possible autobiography" and/or "notability unproven" are acceptable, what you wrote comes over as racist. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 01:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Fair enough. My bad. JayCubby (talk) 01:42, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hello, I'm NoNAja. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Stanford prison experiment—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. NoNAja (talk) 21:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

See edit summary, look over the edits. I'm a semi-newcomer, but you still shouldn't bite me. JayCubby (talk) 21:57, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Games!

I love playing a game called moomoo.io! It's so cool! It's a game wherw you survive from other players! Taming.io is even better! You can tame PETS! But i'm not allowed to play it anymore. Gold-Carts MaKe yOu rIcH (talk) 15:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Interesting. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 15:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	A barnstar for you! Gold-Carts MaKe yOu rIcH (talk) 16:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

@JayCubby, are you an admin? Gold-Carts MaKe yOu rIcH (talk) 16:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

I'm not an admin, lol. I wish... 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 16:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Oof Gold-Carts MaKe yOu rIcH (talk) 16:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)