User talk:Clementina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Esther Clementina)
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Clementina, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Clementina talk 08:14, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Smile![edit]

Hello Clementina, Thesevenseas has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Set Sail For The Seven Seas 15° 1' 15" NET 01:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ever so much, dear Thesevenseas! :) Your sweet, friendly smile just made my day. Warmly, → Clementina [ Scribble ] 03:30, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, glad to hear it made your day. :) Set Sail For The Seven Seas 264° 59' 44" NET 17:39, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kŭmgangsan[edit]

There is inconsistency in Kŭmgangsan in using "Kŭmgangsan" and "Geumgangsan". What do you advise? And for good measure:

I present to you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Protector of Wiki (talk) 04:17, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably best to go with the article's title, unless if you wish to move it to Geumgangsan. Thanks for the kitten. → Clementina [ Scribble ] 08:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your advice. Have you ever considered becoming a mod here, since you are one at Simple? Anyhow, thanks for the work you do here. May Jesus be with you! Protector of Wiki (talk) 08:32, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

<-An admin here? Oh, no, I don't know anything about being a sysop here, and I wouldn't dream of becoming one anytime soon. It's very different from Simple, and I only just started becoming active here a few days ago. Thanks for suggesting it, though. Kindly, → Clementina [ Scribble ] 10:37, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. Less than a hundred edits in and you've already been asked about adminship- shows how excellent you are. But you are correct, this is a rather different environment to simple, and I suspect your thoughtful, unassuming temperament would be less appreciated here simply because it disagrees somewhat with what adminship involves here. Watching this page now, you know where to find me should you need a second pair of eyes for anything. Cheers. sonia♫ 11:17, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, dear Sonia, I really appreciate your kind words, and still more, the manner in which they were offered. :) I don't know if I'll ever get as attached to en as I am to Simple's quiet charm, but I'd still like to help out where I can. Love, → Clementina [ Scribble ] 12:04, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You can find me just as easily if you need a third pair as well. Never underestimate how attached you can get to enwiki, you never know, you might find yourself more attached to this wiki than simplewiki! It is definitely tougher to get adminship here than it is to on simplewiki, but it is definitely possible. In fact, I believe Sonia maybe running for adminship soon, just need to keep watching! Also, I believe you forgot to substitute the template here, that's why the signature didn't come out properly! Set Sail For The Seven Seas 270° 17' 15" NET 18:01, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, thanks, Thesevenseas. :) Enwiki does look quite overwhelming and fast-paced at first, but with such dedicated and friendly users like you and Sonia, I can see why it's so popular. And Sonia, if you ever do make this a blue link, do tell me so I can support! ;) Cheerfully, → Clementina [ Scribble ] 00:35, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please, by all the good there is in this world, don't watchlist my (nonexistent) RfA. I managed to get myself grouped as a "rouge admin" here without even being an administrator; I really don't want the drama that goes along with being one. Perfectly happy to potter around wherever I wish making little changes without having to block/delete/protect. sonia♫ 03:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not all admins have this drama, only the lucky/unlucky ones. Naturally, those who get the drama will be the ones you've heard about. However, there are even more "quiet" admins, which no-one's heard of, especially as there are 859 admins here. They just get on with their duties and avoid the wikidrama. You can find them here. Most of them you won't have heard of. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 327° 33' 45" NET 21:50, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Aye, and I respect both. Anyway, sorry Clem for clogging up your talk page with my insecurities. (Here's a "policy" simplewiki doesn't have that you might find interesting...:P) sonia♫ 00:35, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I came across that one a while ago, though I believe our good friend La Pianista would find it a lot more interesting than I would! Set Sail For The Seven Seas 27° 42' 0" NET 01:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, those diffs were really... interesting, Thesevenseas. ;) @Sonia: Yeah, I love that page. It was really funny. :P → Clementina [ Scribble ] 03:09, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, La Pianista does like self depreciating humour! Set Sail For The Seven Seas 275° 36' 0" NET 18:22, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed so. There's also the lighter side of enwiki, which can prove to be quite entertaining! Set Sail For The Seven Seas 286° 28' 15" NET 19:05, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You forgot this and this. sonia♫ 03:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

<- That's too bad: your eloquence, great intelligence, compassion, and sense of humor would make you a great admin, Sonia. And what's a wiki without some drama to spice things up? :P You two show me such different sides of en - the amazingly bold and amusing side, and the dangerous and scary side. ;) As of now, I'm so bewildered by the enormity of this project that I can scarcely see either, just a trembling wilderness, but I must admit that I'm having fun here already, thanks to both of you. :) Love, → Clementina [ Scribble ] 08:26, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That'll be the best way to go about it. Entering the wilderness not knowing what's out there, where you are or what to expect, in the true spirit of adventure. After all, it is only when you're truly lost can you find what cannot be found! It does also mean there's a lot of treasures hidden deep in the archives or revision histories. One of these is funny vandalism, which tend to be hidden around the place. There's also the lolcats, some of which are quite entertaining! Set Sail For The Seven Seas 336° 34' 45" NET 22:26, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the encouragement and kind words, dear Thesevenseas. :) Hmm, I wouldn't call funny vandalism "hidden treasure" though. ;) Warmly, → Clementina [ Scribble ] 03:09, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There are quite a few others about. There are even wikisongs, one of which Sonia wrote! Set Sail For The Seven Seas 276° 33' 0" NET 18:26, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update[edit]

Moved the GA Review to its dedicated separate subpage, at Talk:Typewriter in the Sky/GA1. Also, placed an update regarding further work done on the article to address suggestions you had raised. :) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 17:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Much better, thanks. :) It's my first time reviewing an article here, so I hope I didn't mess up anything. I've also responded on the talk page. Warmly, → Clementina [ Scribble ] 00:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Replied at that subpage. :) -- Cirt (talk) 00:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Another update - all of the article's subsections have been expanded upon further with additional sourced info from cited sources. Hopefully this is sufficient. However, still in the process of doing some additional research. -- Cirt (talk) 18:43, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(<-) Thank you, dear Cirt: I'm sorry for the late response, as I've been away for a few days. I've replied at the talk page there. :) → Clementina [ Scribble ] 05:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, additional updates there. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 02:21, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Great suggestions, very helpful, thank you! These are all  Done. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 03:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, but curious, per your comment [1], does this mean you will pass it as GA and list it at WP:GA? -- Cirt (talk) 05:05, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

<- Hi Cirt. To be honest, this is my first GA review, so I'm not really sure what to do. I was the initial reviewer, so if I'm satisfied (because I am :)), does that mean I can simply pass it as a GA? → Clementina [ Scribble ] 05:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is exactly what it means. ;) You just have to follow the simple instructions at WP:GAN, to pass it. -- Cirt (talk) 05:11, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I hope I did it correctly. :p → Clementina [ Scribble ] 05:22, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Thanks again, -- Cirt (talk) 05:23, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was a pleasure working with you, Cirt though you did most of the "work" ;) and I'm glad it passed. :) Sincerely, → Clementina [ Scribble ] 05:45, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the kind words! :) -- Cirt (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle and Watchlist[edit]

Hi Clementina!

Just saw your remark at WP:PERM/R. I faced the same problem - the solution is there: Wikipedia_talk:Twinkle#Watchlist... Works like a charm (though not right now, because Twinkle is down: Wikipedia_talk:Twinkle#Not_loading). Alfie↑↓© 00:58, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Twinkle is up again. :-) Alfie↑↓© 01:48, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, Alfie! :) This makes cleaning up much easier—I've been wondering in vain how to disable that for ages, not only here but on the Simple English Wikipedia as well. It works perfectly, thanks once more! Sincerely, → Clementina [ Scribble ] 02:08, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome! "[...] for ages" is the right term. If found the solution myself just a couple of weeks ago somewhere burried in the depths of an archive. ;-) Enjoy & happy editing! Alfie↑↓© 11:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculously late[edit]

Hi Clementia :) This thanks comes ridiculously late :) but it comes with much sincerity. This is a note to communicate my thanks for your voting in my RfA. Astoundingly, and to the shock of everybody, the RfA passed :):) See you around. Sincerely. Wifione ....... Leave a message 15:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Better late than never! Thank you for the thanks. ;) I'm very happy you passed, and I do hope I'll see you around too. Congratulations or condolences on your RFA! Regards, → Clementina [ Scribble ] 05:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cookies[edit]

JamesBWatson has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made him happy and he'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

I'm glad you enjoyed my cookie, dear James—you more than deserved it. :) Sincerely, Clementina talk 10:58, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to spam...[edit]

You could spam my page while you're at it. :P Might be a tad more informative for the active editors here. (That said, I really don't like seeing the orange bar misappropriated since it already freaks me out when it's legit, although I have to admit it works.) sonia♫ 05:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, and  Done. You're right, I always jump when I see orange bars, and it makes me get quite annoyed when I click on it and it goes to articles like practical joke or "got you"! And in this case, it makes my talk page look oh so ugly. :P But this is all for a good cause.. ;) → Clementina [ Scribble ] 06:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

to make it official...[edit]

Hi, and welcome to WikiProject Articles for creation! We are a group of editors who work together on the Articles for creation and Images for upload pages.

A few tips that you might find helpful:

  • Please take time to fully read the reviewers' instructions before reviewing submissions.
  • The project's discussion board is the best place to ask for help or advice. You might like to watchlist this page, and you are encouraged to take part in any discussion that comes up.

Once again, welcome to the project. sonia♫ 00:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, dear Sonia! :) This project, though it's a little frightening in its complexity, certainly looks both interesting and worthwhile, so I'll try to help where I can. → Clementina [ Scribble ] 13:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the salad![edit]

Dear Clementina, thanks for the salad. It was delicious and much appreciated. Susfele (talk) 03:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, thank you for cleaning up the vandalism on my talk page. :) I know how annoying it is to manually remove nonsense, and I feel very grateful for it. Thanks once again, → Clementina [ Scribble ] 03:03, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Buck[edit]

Hello Clementina,
If you havent found it yet, there is more 'raw' material on Buck [here], if you wish to use it. Regards - 220.101 talk\Contribs 13:40, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the helpful link, 220.101.28.25 (wow, that's a long, um, username)! ;) I never met an IP with a userpage before. :) I was actually supposed to help Sonia with it, but I couldn't keep my promise because I had to go unexpectedly to church (sorry, Sonia). However, I'll see if I can help with anything in the article today and just hope I don't mess it up. Love, → Clementina [ Scribble ] 01:48, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You've done fine, Clem. I assume you're using Cite4wiki or something for your references? When citing news articles I tend to use RefToolbar, it is slower but fills out more information. (You need to help me convince 220.101 to get an account!) By the way: are you free to talk for a few minutes? sonia♫ 01:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how I can convince 220.101 to get an account if your eloquence fails. :) Yeah, I usually use Cite4wiki for websites, because computers confuse me. As for talking...I'd love to, but I think it'll have to be after one hour. It's actually my study time right now. Caught red-handed! :o /me scurries back to work → Clementina [ Scribble ] 02:02, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strike that - talking with Sonia is a resistless pleasure! I ended up having a nice chat with her anyway. → Clementina [ Scribble ] 02:26, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update[edit]

Addressed your helpful suggestions, at Talk:My Life in Orange/GA1. ;) Thanks again, -- Cirt (talk) 04:48, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, again. :P -- Cirt (talk) 05:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted - wonderful work, Cirt! :) Sincerely, → Clementina [ Scribble ] 05:25, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! :) -- Cirt (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ecuador Crisis article[edit]

I indeed did give a reason, please don't send me irrelevant form messages unless you can be more specific. 24.215.174.233 (talk) 01:38, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My sincere apologies for any inconvenience - I see you did specify a reason in the talk page, and it seems to have been made in good faith. Next time, though, please include your reason in the edit summary (for example, you could have written "per reason on talk page"). This helps people who are checking on the recent changes for vandalism know the reason for your removal. Best, Clementina talk 01:48, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Maria Brontë[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

D :D :D My first DYK on en! :) Clementina talk 03:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Welcome[edit]

Sorry for the late reply and thanks a lot for the warm welcome. I won't be much of assistance to this site for a while since I'm occupied with other wikis on the web but it is really nice you left me a message. Also, thanks a lot for the tip as well as the links. --Montechristo95 talk • contribs 20:14, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your thanks. ;) It's not often one gets a reply for a welcome. I certainly hope you'll find editing Wikipedia enjoyable and have fun here. Very sincerely, Clementina talk 00:41, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah you can bet I hope that too. Well what I will be doing here mostly is patrolling the recent changes page until I find a project to work on. And btw I really like your habbit of replying to messages on the same page they have been posted. It greately helps keeping conversations together. Unfortunately, I carry the awful habbit of replying to messages with the "RE:" style from other wikis around the web. --Montechristo95 talk • contribs 09:15, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's great, I'm sure you'll do excellently here, as you seem to already have some experience with other wikis. :) Yes, I do like to try to keep conversations in the same place, but I'm afraid that's more selfish than yours, as it denies others the pleasure of seeing a cheery orange bar pop up. ;) Users use both methods on Wikipedia, though replying on the same page is (I think) more common. Best wishes, Clementina talk 10:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcoming IPs[edit]

Hi Clementina. Just note that for welcoming IPs, you must use {{subst:welcome-anon}}. Cheers. -Porchcrop (talk|contributions) 00:58, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Porchcrop, thanks for the note! :) I do generally use that template, but for edits such as this, I wasn't quite sure if it was a test or a good faith mistake in thinking that the Dursleys took care of Harry from when he was one year old, so instead of welcome-anon (which would say "thank you for your contributions"), I decided to use {{welcome0}} instead. :) Love, Clementina talk 01:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. But Template:Welcome0 is for users that have created their userpage but have not contributed elsewhere. How about use {{welcomelaws}}. -Porchcrop (talk|contributions) 01:28, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Great idea, thanks for the helpful link! :) Didn't know it existed. Best, Clementina talk 01:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem. Best regards, -Porchcrop (talk|contributions) 01:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WP:VPC[edit]

You are welcome to WP:VPC! --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 12:46, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, how lovely - thank you! :) I'll continue hunting around to see if there's anything I can do to help in it. Thank you again, Extra! Love, Clementina talk 05:53, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested changes at MOTD[edit]

Hello fellow motto contributor. Discussions arer still open on Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Nominations#Suggested changes and still require further input especially on ideas 10-17. Please could you voice your opinion as this is going to be closed in early November. Please help out or even make any new idea suggestions. Simply south (talk) 15:25, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try, SS - thanks for the note! :) Clementina talk 03:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is a last call. Any opinions should be suggested by and including November 5th. See Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Nominations/Archive 2#Suggested Changes Simply south (talk) 21:29, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Smile![edit]

Hello Clementina, Sabrinamagers has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Oh, my - that was unexpected. Thank you, dear Sabrina, for adding a little beam of sunshine to my day. It did make me smile. :) Clementina talk 03:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In regrards to your help[edit]

Thank You for your help.TucsonDavid (talk) 11:58, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're more than welcome, dear David, and I'm sorry for my mistaken reading of your comment at first. :) My talk page is always open for questions, and if I can't answer it, one of my few, but very clever talk page stalkers may be able to help. ;) Warmly, Clementina talk 12:54, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Children and Young Adult's literature WikiProject Newsletter - Issue 3[edit]

Newsletter November 2010

Project news
  • The project's most popular page in September was Harry Potter which received 481902 views throughout the month. That means that it received on average 16063 views each day. It's a GA which is Top importance within the project's scope. To see more popular pages head over to the list now.
  • The Children's literature Portal is up for Peer review. Please feel free to chime in here.
  • Pandawing$ has joined the project. Thanks for joining Pandawing$.
Articles needing infoboxes

There are lots of articles within this project's scope without infoboxes. They can help to improve the quality of an article by adding a brief overview. It's a task that won't take very long so why not head over now and help out?


From the Editor

Hello and welcome to this, the third edition of our WikiProject's newsletter. In this month's newsletter, I encountered a problem, well, two problems actually. I needed some help with the production: suggestions and other writers. As with last month, if you have any suggestions for the newsletter, please add them at the Tips Desk. If you would like to write some of the next issue, that's even better! Just come go over to the main Newsletter page to see where you can help out, and of course, as always, please give us your feedback on this edition, on the talk page. Until next time, happy editing!

Share:  Twitter · Identica · Facebook · Delicious · Reddit · Digg · Buzz · StumbleUpon
Children's literature news


Want to help on the next newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? - It's all here



Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Children's literature at 18:06, 1 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Clementina. You have new messages at Talk:Seekers (novel series)/GA1.
Message added 16:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK nomination of The Female Quixote[edit]

Hello! Your submission of The Female Quixote at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! hkr Laozi speak 00:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

reminder[edit]

If I remember correctly, you were reviewing Seekers (novel series) for GA. The review hasn't been touched for almost a month now... Brambleclawx 18:30, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that her computer is broken, I'll probably have to have a new reviewer soon. Derild4921☼ 19:34, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm so sorry for the inconvenience. :( I'm afraid I won't be able to finish the review anytime soon, so it'll probably be best to find a reviewer to finish the job. Once again, I'm sorry for the inconvenience this must have caused. Sincerely, Clementina talk 04:30, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

/* Christmas mottos and a note to self to spell determined correctly next time when acting like a bot */[edit]

The motto idea for those between 25th December and mid January needs consensus dtermined badly on which version should be used for which day or even whether the whole idea should be scrapped or postponed. Please help by discussion and determining consensus at WT:Motto of the day/Nominations#Christmas series and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/Specials. The deadline is Friday at 9pm UTC. Simply south (talk) and their tree 23:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors[edit]

Hi! I noticed your activity as a Good Article reviewer, and wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sage Ross! :) Thanks a lot for the kind message, but though I think I'm friendly most of the time (on the Internet, at least ), I have neither the ability nor the regular activity needed to be an ambassador. I'm most likely going to be especially busy in the following few months and my activity on the English Wikipedia will be little or nothing, so I'm afraid I'll have to decline. Thanks once again, though, and hopefully one day I'll be worthy to help out in that area! :) Clementina talk 12:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I look forward to maybe working with you down the road.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 14:27, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from MOTD[edit]

Hello. We could do with your assistance for suggestions of mottos and any decisions on current ones. Please see Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations. In case this situation occurs again, we would like a discussion on emergency mottos. Please see WT:MOTD/N#Emergency mottos. Simply south...... 14:49, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FUI[edit]

This is just a reminder. If a motto has been used multiple times it should be under or added to Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/Frequently used ideas. Simply south...... improving for 5 years So much for ER 10:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail![edit]

Hello, Clementina. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Articles for Creation Appeal[edit]

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently the are 2551 submissions waiting to be reviewed.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

Future of MOTD[edit]

I've decided to start a project discussion on this. Please see WT:MOTD. Simply south...... having large explosions for 5 years 17:51, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Backlog[edit]

Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2551 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at User:Timotheus Canens/afchelper4.js which helps in reviewing in just few edits easily!

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial.
On behalf of the Articles for Creation project,
TheSpecialUser TSU

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help![edit]

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2551 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at WP:AFCH!

News

Good article nominee AFCH script improvements
  • 1.16 to 1.17
    • Batman still works!

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser TSU

WikiWomen's Collaborative[edit]

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi Clementina! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 00:59, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive[edit]

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

EdwardsBot (talk) 00:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation needs YOUR help![edit]

Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2551 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
Thanks in advance, Nathan2055talk - contribs

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:33, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.

WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter[edit]

Delivered 00:56, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You![edit]

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library![edit]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
Hi Clementina! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 20:06, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject AFC needs your help... again[edit]

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.

Delivered at 12:59, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive[edit]

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2500 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. --Mdann52talk to me!

This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Jjimjilbang[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Jjimjilbang—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. mettokki (talk) 07:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Choccie" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Choccie. Since you had some involvement with the Choccie redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Clementina&oldid=1145852031"