Talk:McDonald's Chicago Flagship/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Fine, I made a few tweaks for clarity

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Ok, I added subscription required to the Proquest cites

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I would suggest that there are two many images, but I will not de-list it on that basis.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I am happy for this article to keep its GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:02, 21 November 2009 (UTC)