Talk:Monetary Policy Committee (United Kingdom)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 15:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Article is stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Image complies to fair use requirements.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments:

• Numbers over nine should be written numerically, and up to nine, written out. E.g. It comprises 8 members, only 5 days, 2 years, etc.
• Hyphens are used instead of dashes, see WP:DASH.
• There are some low-level grammar issues like "most commonly via the setting the rate". Check for other similar issues.
• Perhaps the former members section could be in two columns.

Summary: There are just some small minor issues that need to be addressed before it can be passed as a Good Article. I will allow up to seven days for these issues to be fixed.

Final summary: Thank you so much for all your hard work in helping make this a better article. I have split the membership section into two columns, I feel that it looks neater this way. If you disagree, you may change it back. I am now confident that this article meets all the requirements for a Good Article and I am happy to pass it. Well done! -- S Masters (talk) 06:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC)