Talk:Huang Kuo-shu (born 1905)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Huang Guo-shu)

Requested move 11 January 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 04:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


}

Huang Guo-shuHuang Kuo-shu (born 1905) – Naming of "Guo-shu" seems not to be in accordance with Wade–Giles naming custom. Alternative would be Huang Guoshu but "Kuo-shu" is preferred for the prevailing use of Wade–Giles in Taiwan. Reference see Taiwan Today report. ~~ J. Dann 08:31, 11 January 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 09:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Taiwan has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 09:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Biography has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 09:10, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support some kind of move to "Huang Kuo-shu" with a suitable disambiguator; more correct Wade-Giles seems to be what more (at least the older) sources use, and disambiguating between two legislators in Taiwan by choice of (incorrect) romanisation seems like a bad idea. I don't know whether "general" or "President of the Legislative Yuan" would work even better, but the romanisation issue should be fixed. —Kusma (talk) 09:41, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The source cited above is from 1964, when Wade-Giles was much more commonly used than it is today. How do modern sources transliterate the subject's name? This source, cited in the article, uses pinyin "Huang Guoshu". We generally use pinyin unless modern English-language sources favor a different spelling (WP:PINYIN). That said, I agree it seems confusing to distinguish the two subjects only by choice of romanization. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 16:49, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.