Talk:Jews in Hong Kong/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: An anonymous username, not my real name (talk · contribs) 21:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I will attempt to review this. I will use this existing good article as something of a reference. Not to discourage you, but I think your article focuses a little too much on their modern status, and contains relatively little actual history. It may be best to split it into separate articles. I would hate to quickfail it, but it will need a lot of work. As soon as I can, I will try to have a list of specific recommendations. --An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 21:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, after reading it over some more I'm afraid it doesn't give broad enough coverage; again, it focuses largely on modern Jewish Hong Kongers. I am requesting a second opinion, but I'm leaning towards quickfailing it. --An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 23:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would the issue be fixed if the article was renamed to "Jews in Hong Kong" (similar to Jews in Istanbul)? The Jewish community of Hong Kong was tiny before the late 20th century, so there's not really any room to broaden the topic of history any more than what's already in the article. — Golden call me maybe? 08:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think renaming it would make more sense. I guess perhaps I overreacted. I will work on a full review. --An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 21:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I will rename the article to "Jews in Hong Kong" tomorrow (not today to avoid any possible technical issues with its current display at the Main Page as a DYK). Have a good day! — Golden call me maybe? 21:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've now moved the article to "Jews in Hong Kong". — Golden call me maybe? 15:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I strenuously object to this move. Golden, while your work on this article certainly merits praise and thanks from the community, I think your move was extremely hasty, and I urge you to consider undoing it and opening a proper move proposal instead. Thank you! Joefromrandb (talk) 06:33, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Joefromrandb - Sorry, just saw this. Sure, I can move it back and have an RM. — Golden call me maybe? 10:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]