File talk:Seganomad.jpg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconVideo games: Sega File‑class
WikiProject iconThis file is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
FileThis file does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This file is supported by the Sega task force.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:
WikiProject iconElectronics File‑class
WikiProject iconThis file is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the file attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
FileThis file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

{{information}} and User:Stefan2 and User:76.65.131.248[edit]

Apparently(?) Stefan2 finds my adding information found on the file page into a proper {{information}} objectionable. I don't see why, since it was clearly visible on the file page prior to my standardizing it into the template.

05:10, 23 November 2004 296 × 331 (23 KB) Armaced (talk · contribs) Another version, smaller still, cropped. I took the picture.
05:08, 23 November 2004 400 × 300 (24 KB) Armaced (talk · contribs) Smaller image of a picture I took

Clearly the upload log indicates who took the picture, so the author and source are clear! If it is true or false depends on Armaced's claims, not mine. It has no bearing to what the information is available for conversion into the {{information}} area. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 11:08, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't see the information in the upload summary. A different user had tagged the file as having no source, and that user presumably also missed the upload summary. Thanks to the upload summary, I agree that we have a source. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]